TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in Dar. Blanch vs F. C. Jianu (Wimbledon on 2026-06-22) — the market is efficient, with Dar. Blanch favoured at 1.18.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | Dar. Blanch | F. C. Jianu |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
81.0% | 19.0% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
62.6% | 37.4% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
74.1% | 25.9% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
81.2% | 18.8% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dar. Blanch | hard | 1549 | 56–41 | 97 |
| F. C. Jianu | clay | 1586 | 241–150 | 391 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 28, 2026.
Dar. Blanch leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 22, 2026 | Wimbledon | grass | Dar. Blanch | 2 - 0 |
| L | C. Wong | 2 - 0 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | M. Lajal | 2 - 1 | July 21, 2026 |
| L | B. Tomic | 1 - 2 | July 15, 2026 |
| L | J. Fearnley | 0 - 2 | July 10, 2026 |
| W | G. Johns | 1 - 2 | July 9, 2026 |
| L | S. H. Haita | 0 - 0 | July 29, 2026 |
| L | N. Gombos | 0 - 0 | July 21, 2026 |
| L | Dar. Blanch | 2 - 0 | June 22, 2026 |
| L | L. Sonego | 2 - 0 | June 13, 2026 |
| L | A. Shevchenko | 1 - 0 | June 9, 2026 |
All June 22, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used