TENNISEDGE.GG

C. Rodesch vs D. Lajovic — Prediction & Analysis

Wimbledon · ATP Wimbledon - Semi-finals · June 24, 2026 · 12:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in C. Rodesch vs D. Lajovic (Wimbledon on 2026-06-24) — the market is efficient, with C. Rodesch favoured at 1.53.

Surface grass Odds C. Rodesch 1.53 · D. Lajovic 2.38

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: C. Rodesch · D. Lajovic · head-to-head record · Wimbledon

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method C. Rodesch D. Lajovic
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
62.7% 37.3%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
61.9% 38.1%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
41.6% 58.4%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
56.8% 43.2%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
60.9% 39.1%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
C. Rodesch hard1747 66–2894
D. Lajovic clay1639 99–80179

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 19, 2026.

Head to head

D. Lajovic leads 2–0 over 2 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 24, 2026WimbledongrassD. Lajovic2 - 0
April 21, 2026MadridclayD. Lajovic2 - 0

Recent form

C. Rodesch

W I. Ivashka 2 - 1 July 19, 2026
W A. Santillan 2 - 0 July 18, 2026
W O. Crawford 2 - 1 July 17, 2026
W P. Inchauspe 2 - 0 July 15, 2026
W M. Alkaya 2 - 1 July 13, 2026

D. Lajovic

L C. Hewitt 0 - 0 July 25, 2026
L L. van Assche 1 - 2 July 13, 2026
L T. Fritz 3 - 0 June 30, 2026
L V. Gaubas 3 - 2 June 25, 2026
W C. Rodesch 0 - 2 June 24, 2026

All June 24, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used