TENNISEDGE.GG

C. McNally vs P. Marcinko — Prediction & Analysis

Eastbourne · WTA Eastbourne - Quarter-finals · June 25, 2026 · 17:30 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in C. McNally vs P. Marcinko (Eastbourne on 2026-06-25) — the market is efficient, with C. McNally favoured at 1.36.

Surface grass Odds C. McNally 1.36 · P. Marcinko 2.85

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: C. McNally · P. Marcinko · head-to-head record · Eastbourne

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method C. McNally P. Marcinko
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
72.5% 27.5%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
46.5% 53.5%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
56.3% 43.7%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
58.4% 41.6%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
67.7% 32.3%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
C. McNally hard1736 85–66151
P. Marcinko clay1727 89–46135

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 4, 2026.

Head to head

C. McNally leads 2–1 over 3 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 25, 2026EastbournegrassP. Marcinko2 - 1
May 15, 2025W75 ZagrebclayC. McNally2 - 0
Oct. 13, 2022W60 Trnava 2hardC. McNally2 - 0

Recent form

C. McNally

W T. Maria 1 - 2 Aug. 4, 2026
L K. Liutova 2 - 0 July 31, 2026
W Y. Ma 0 - 2 July 30, 2026
W Xiy. Wang 1 - 2 July 28, 2026
L E. Rybakina 0 - 2 July 2, 2026

P. Marcinko

L T. Zidansek 2 - 0 July 17, 2026
W E. Avanesyan 0 - 2 July 15, 2026
W N. Podoroska 1 - 2 July 13, 2026
L C. Burel 1 - 2 July 7, 2026
L S. Kenin 0 - 2 June 30, 2026

All June 25, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

The mathematical consensus identifies a negligible 1.6% edge for Marcinko, but the Kelly criterion correctly suggests zero units, indicating insufficient value to overcome the high margin. Qualitative analysis reveals significant red flags for Marcinko: she is coming off a 3.5-hour marathon match and faces a 2-0 H2H deficit against McNally, who is fresher and described as more experienced on grass. The ML model's outlier prediction (favoring Marcinko) contradicts ELO and market trends, suggesting the calculated edge is likely noise rather than a true opportunity.