TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in C. Bucsa vs P. Udvardy (Guadalajara on 2026-09-15) — the market is efficient, with C. Bucsa favoured at 1.41.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | C. Bucsa | P. Udvardy |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
63.7% | 36.3% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
58.1% | 41.9% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
73.3% | 26.7% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
65.0% | 35.0% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
67.3% | 32.7% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Bucsa | hard | 1757 | 135–100 | 235 |
| P. Udvardy | hard | 1612 | 48–59 | 107 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Sept. 13, 2026.
C. Bucsa leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug. 13, 2026 | Cincinnati | hard | C. Bucsa | 2 - 1 |
| W | B. Andreescu | 2 - 0 | Sept. 13, 2026 |
| L | C. Gauff | 0 - 2 | Sept. 5, 2026 |
| W | H. Sakatsume | 2 - 1 | Sept. 3, 2026 |
| W | S. Bejlek | 1 - 2 | Aug. 31, 2026 |
| L | D. Vidmanova | 0 - 2 | Aug. 26, 2026 |
| W | L. Boisson | 2 - 1 | Sept. 13, 2026 |
| L | M. Sawangkaew | 2 - 0 | Aug. 31, 2026 |
| L | E. Mertens | 1 - 2 | Aug. 26, 2026 |
| W | M. Joint | 2 - 0 | Aug. 25, 2026 |
| L | D. Vidmanova | 1 - 2 | Aug. 23, 2026 |
All Sept. 15, 2026 results & picks →