TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in B. Bonzi vs H. Dellien (Montreal on 2026-08-01) — the market is efficient, with B. Bonzi favoured at 1.25.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | B. Bonzi | H. Dellien |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
87.9% | 12.1% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
75.9% | 24.1% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
69.8% | 30.2% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
76.7% | 23.3% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
75.0% | 25.0% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Bonzi | hard | 1746 | 163–94 | 257 |
| H. Dellien | clay | 1741 | 207–112 | 319 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 3, 2026.
B. Bonzi leads 2–0 over 2 meetings. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug. 1, 2026 | Montreal | hard | B. Bonzi | 2 - 0 |
| May 20, 2024 | ATP French Open | clay | B. Bonzi | 2 - 1 |
| L | Y. Hanfmann | 1 - 2 | Aug. 3, 2026 |
| W | H. Dellien | 2 - 0 | Aug. 1, 2026 |
| L | J. D. Hara Friend | 1 - 2 | July 30, 2026 |
| W | M. Mmoh | 2 - 0 | July 29, 2026 |
| W | B. Bicknell | 2 - 1 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | B. Bonzi | 2 - 0 | Aug. 1, 2026 |
| L | J. C. Prado Angelo | 1 - 0 | July 29, 2026 |
| W | P. Martinez | 0 - 2 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | L. Djere | 0 - 2 | July 19, 2026 |
| W | M. Ribecai | 2 - 1 | July 18, 2026 |
All Aug. 1, 2026 results & picks →
═══ B. Bonzi (A) vs H. Dellien (B) — Montreal, hard, Final ═══ MODELS vs MARKET ELO(A) 0.879 | ML(A) 0.759 | blend(A) 0.767 Market: A 1.25 (impl ~0.80 / devig 0.75), B 3.75 (impl 0.267). value_pick A, edge +1.7% (marginal). Own blend (0.767) sits AT/BELOW the 0.80 implied on the favourite -> no value backing A. B model prob = 0.233 < 0.267 implied -> no value backing the dog either. Market efficient. RECENT FORM (last 5 each) A Bonzi (30, #101): Vancouver QF L 7-5 6-7 5-7 (Hara Friend 1644, 3-set loss 07-30); Vancouver R16 W 7-5 6-4 (Mmoh 1716); R32 W 3-6 6-3 6-4 (Bicknell); Wimb L (Diallo); Nottingham QF L. Match-sharp on hard (3 at Vancouver this week) but shape STABLE-to-FADING (lost yesterday's 3-setter). Hard-court tour player, legit ELO for surface. B Dellien (33, #133): San Marino R16 L (Prado Angelo 1350, clay); San Marino R32 W (Martinez); Kitzbuhel Final L to Djere; all recent results CLAY (Trieste challenger title, Kitzbuhel final). Clay specialist. PATH / SHAPE / TRANSITION Dellien = CLAY specialist transitioning to HARD (all last ~15 matches clay). Depresses his level on this surface -> if anything ELO's 0.879 for Bonzi may UNDERstate on hard. Bonzi hard-court player, 3 matches deep at venue = match-sharp. ELO/rank: Bonzi ELO 0.879 but ranked 101; Dellien clay-inflated. Divergence noted, not leaned on. FATIGUE (context only, no extreme spot decides) A: 3 matches/7d, played+lost a 3-set match 07-30 (back_to_back 2), age 30. B: 2/7d, last match 07-29, age 33. Neither carries a decisive extreme fatigue spot; cumulative-minutes gap = context, not edge. PRICING No betfair_ml (exchange price absent) -> ML would need >=8% edge vs BOOK quote AND book-priced flag, or prefer PASS. Favourite A: need ~0.88 to clear 8% at 1.25; only ELO reaches it, blend 0.767 does not -> FAIL. Dog B: model 0.233 < 0.267 implied -> negative EV -> FAIL. GATES G1 edge-origin: FAIL — no numeric model-vs-market edge >=5% on either side before any narrative; blend sits below the favourite's implied. G2 consensus: PASS — (stake-tier only, does not block). G3 fatal-risk: PASS — (ML scope, does not block). VERDICT: PASS. Market prices the favourite fairly (blend 0.767 vs implied 0.75-0.80); no exchange liquidity; both sides fail the edge bar. Book-priced small events are the losing segment. No bet.