TENNISEDGE.GG

A. Zantedeschi vs E. Jacquemot — Prediction & Analysis

Contrexeville · Contrexeville - 1/16-finals · July 7, 2026 · 10:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in A. Zantedeschi vs E. Jacquemot (Contrexeville on 2026-07-07) — the market is efficient, with E. Jacquemot favoured at 1.43.

Surface clay Odds A. Zantedeschi 2.62 · E. Jacquemot 1.43

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: A. Zantedeschi · E. Jacquemot · head-to-head record · Contrexeville

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method A. Zantedeschi E. Jacquemot
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
47.4% 52.6%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
38.0% 62.0%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
43.4% 56.6%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
40.5% 59.5%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
35.3% 64.7%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
A. Zantedeschi clay1562 107–95202
E. Jacquemot hard1619 102–82184

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 29, 2026.

Head to head

A. Zantedeschi leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
July 7, 2026ContrexevilleclayA. Zantedeschi2 - 0

Recent form

A. Zantedeschi

L A. Fita Boluda 2 - 0 July 29, 2026
L M. Trevisan 0 - 2 July 16, 2026
W F. Ferro 1 - 2 July 14, 2026
L J. Vandromme 2 - 0 July 11, 2026
W A. Blinkova 0 - 2 July 10, 2026

E. Jacquemot

L C. Y. Lee 0 - 2 Aug. 4, 2026
L M. Sherif 2 - 0 July 23, 2026
W T. J. Brockmann 0 - 2 July 22, 2026
L C. Burel 2 - 0 July 15, 2026
W I. D. Amariei 0 - 2 July 14, 2026

All July 7, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used