TENNISEDGE.GG

A. Herrero Linana vs M. Sherif — Prediction & Analysis

Contrexeville · Contrexeville - Quarter-finals · July 10, 2026 · 12:30 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in A. Herrero Linana vs M. Sherif (Contrexeville on 2026-07-10) — the market is efficient, with M. Sherif favoured at 1.12.

Surface clay Odds A. Herrero Linana 5.50 · M. Sherif 1.12

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: A. Herrero Linana · M. Sherif · head-to-head record · Contrexeville

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method A. Herrero Linana M. Sherif
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
23.1% 76.9%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
16.9% 83.1%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
58.1% 41.9%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
23.1% 76.9%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
16.9% 83.1%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
A. Herrero Linana clay1519 51–4293
M. Sherif clay1837 179–72251

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 10, 2026.

Head to head

M. Sherif leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
July 10, 2026ContrexevilleclayM. Sherif2 - 0

Recent form

A. Herrero Linana

L V. Wolff 2 - 1 July 25, 2026
W A. Fita Boluda 0 - 2 July 24, 2026
W J. Mikulskyte 2 - 0 July 22, 2026
W T. Lukas 1 - 2 July 20, 2026
L I. Burillo Escorihuela 2 - 0 July 17, 2026

M. Sherif

L T. Korpatsch 0 - 1 July 25, 2026
W P. Badosa 2 - 1 July 24, 2026
W E. Jacquemot 2 - 0 July 23, 2026
W S. Waltert 1 - 2 July 22, 2026
W P. Badosa 1 - 0 July 20, 2026

All July 10, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used