TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in A. Charaeva vs V. Jimenez Kasintseva (Iasi on 2026-07-13) — the market is efficient, with A. Charaeva favoured at 1.50.
═══════════════════════════════════════
A. Charaeva vs V. Jimenez Kasintseva — Iasi (clay), 1/16-finals
═══════════════════════════════════════
MODELS
Elo prob A: 68.5% ML prob A: 56.0% Blended model prob A: 68.5%
Market implied prob A: 63.6% (odds 1.50 / 2.62) Value edge (model_prob_a vs market): +4.9% on A
Elo and ML diverge by ~12.5pts on the same match — a red flag for model reliability here.
Averaging Elo+ML gives ~62.2%, essentially equal to market implied prob → little to no real edge.
RECENT FORM
A. Charaeva (last 5): L Final vs Kudermetova(1641, Wimbledon) | W vs Werner(1565, grind 7-5/4-6/0-6)
| W vs Mandlik(1650) | L vs Aksu(1628, qual) | W vs Bandecchi(1648, qual)
Deep, high-quality 2026 run: Wimbledon SF/Final, French Open QF, Madrid Final, Paris title (5/11).
Mixed W-L (~15-9 over last 24) but consistently facing Strong/Elite opposition and reaching finals.
V. Jimenez Kasintseva (last 5): L vs Sorribes Tormo(1501, Wimbledon 1/64) | L vs Kawa(1718, Modena qual SF)
| W vs Romero Gormaz(1659) | W vs Lepchenko(1575) | W vs Pieri(1452)
Largely ITF/qualifying-level circuit (Modena qual, Makarska, Parma), lower overall resume than A.
FATIGUE
A: 0 matches in 14d, last match 2026-06-25 (18d ago) — fully rested.
B: 1 match in 14d (2026-06-29, 54min, 3 sets) — light load, also essentially rested.
Diff in court-time/matches is small → Roughly equal, slight rest edge to A.
NARRATIVE
Let-down: A lost a Wimbledon Final 18 days ago — outside the 0-3d NOTE window, no live signal.
Venue momentum: neither player has Iasi history in the sample.
Title recency: A — Paris title 63d ago (clay); no recent title signal for B.
VERDICT: PASS
The market price (1.50/63.6%) already sits between the Elo (68.5%) and ML (56.0%) reads — the two
models disagree with each other more than either disagrees with the market. The "value" on A is an
artifact of the blend leaning entirely on Elo; ML sees this as closer to a coinflip. A's resume is
clearly stronger on paper, but that's already priced into a -200-ish favorite. No independent
qualitative signal (fatigue, letdown, venue) tips the scale further. Thin, unconfirmed edge → pass.
═══════════════════════════════════════