N. Chappell leads the head-to-head 4-3 since 2018 against J. R. Statham, over 7 matches.
Today on TennisEdge
32 ATP & WTA matches analysed today
Model probabilities, market read and our staked picks — see today's board →
By surface
| Surface | N. Chappell | J. R. Statham |
| Clay | 1 | 1 |
| Hard | 3 | 2 |
Current ELO by surface
| Surface | N. Chappell | J. R. Statham |
| Hard |
1313 (127-121) |
1269 (65-65) |
| Clay |
1236 (14-27) |
1261 (9-15) |
| Grass |
1425 (0-1) |
— |
ELO is computed per surface from results since 2018; the win-loss pair is that surface's record.
Match history
| Date | Winner | Score | Event |
| March 31, 2024 | N. Chappell | 2 - 1 | Mexico City Challenger Men · Semi-finals · clay |
| Sept. 4, 2023 | N. Chappell | 2 - 0 | Shanghai Challenger Men · Final · hard |
| June 13, 2023 | J. R. Statham | 2 - 1 | Palmas Del Mar · 1/16-finals · hard |
| June 5, 2023 | N. Chappell | 2 - 0 | Tyler Challenger Men · Final · hard |
| March 26, 2023 | J. R. Statham | 2 - 1 | Mexico City Challenger Men · Semi-finals · clay |
| March 7, 2023 | J. R. Statham | 2 - 0 | Puerto Vallarta Challenger Men · Final · hard |
| Feb. 27, 2023 | N. Chappell | 2 - 0 | ATP Acapulco · Final · hard |
Recent form
| Date | | Opponent | Score | Event |
| June 30, 2025 |
L |
H. Moriya |
2 - 0 |
Cary · Final · hard |
| June 29, 2025 |
W |
T. McCormick |
2 - 1 |
Cary · Semi-finals · hard |
| June 18, 2025 |
L |
S. Imai |
0 - 1 |
M25 Luzhou · 1/16-finals · hard |
| June 10, 2025 |
L |
E. Zhu |
2 - 1 |
M15 Luan 8 · 1/16-finals · hard |
| June 6, 2025 |
L |
T. Huang |
1 - 2 |
M15 Luan 7 · Quarter-finals · hard |
| Date | | Opponent | Score | Event |
| Oct. 27, 2024 |
L |
M. Sasikumar |
1 - 2 |
Seoul Challenger Men · Semi-finals · hard |
| Oct. 21, 2024 |
L |
S. Shin |
2 - 1 |
Taipei 2 · Final · hard |
| Oct. 20, 2024 |
W |
F. Reynolds |
0 - 2 |
Taipei 2 · Semi-finals · hard |
| Oct. 14, 2024 |
W |
Z. Dong |
0 - 2 |
Shenzhen 2 · Semi-finals · hard |
| Oct. 14, 2024 |
L |
A. Weber |
1 - 0 |
Shenzhen 2 · Final · hard |
Read next: How accurate are these predictions? We measured every one →