TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in M. Sherif vs E. Yaneva (Brescia (Italy) - Qualification on 2026-06-20) — the market is efficient, with M. Sherif favoured at 1.40.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | M. Sherif | E. Yaneva |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
66.6% | 33.4% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
60.6% | 39.4% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
44.3% | 55.7% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
66.6% | 33.4% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
66.3% | 33.7% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 25, 2026.
M. Sherif leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 20, 2026 | Brescia (Italy) - Qualification | clay | M. Sherif | 2 - 0 |
| L | T. Korpatsch | 0 - 1 | July 25, 2026 |
| W | P. Badosa | 2 - 1 | July 24, 2026 |
| W | E. Jacquemot | 2 - 0 | July 23, 2026 |
| W | S. Waltert | 1 - 2 | July 22, 2026 |
| W | P. Badosa | 1 - 0 | July 20, 2026 |
| W | L. Klimovicova | 1 - 2 | Aug. 4, 2026 |
| L | F. Urgesi | 2 - 1 | July 20, 2026 |
| L | M. Trevisan | 1 - 2 | July 17, 2026 |
| W | S. Lansere | 2 - 0 | July 15, 2026 |
| W | O. Selekhmeteva | 0 - 2 | July 13, 2026 |
All June 20, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used