TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in J. McCabe vs A. M. Jong (Hertogenbosch on 2026-06-07) — the market is efficient, with J. McCabe favoured at 1.36.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | J. McCabe | A. M. Jong |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
31.4% | 68.6% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
23.1% | 76.9% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
27.2% | 72.8% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
68.8% | 31.2% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. McCabe | hard | 1553 | 154–113 | 267 |
| A. M. Jong | clay | 1410 | 52–33 | 85 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 25, 2026.
J. McCabe leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 7, 2026 | Hertogenbosch | grass | J. McCabe | 2 - 0 |
| L | A. Bolt | 0 - 2 | July 25, 2026 |
| L | D. Chan | 1 - 2 | July 21, 2026 |
| L | B. Tomic | 0 - 2 | July 16, 2026 |
| W | M. Imamura | 0 - 2 | July 15, 2026 |
| L | J. Jung | 0 - 2 | July 8, 2026 |
| L | M. Petkovic | 0 - 2 | July 13, 2026 |
| W | M. Chazal | 1 - 2 | July 12, 2026 |
| L | A. Juan Mano | 2 - 1 | July 10, 2026 |
| W | E. Vasa | 2 - 0 | July 9, 2026 |
| W | J. Schifris | 0 - 2 | July 7, 2026 |
All June 7, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used